London Breed, the mayor of San Francisco, doesn’t want to hear that.
According to a new study conducted by WalletHub, the city is regarded as the worst-run in the country when it comes to local governance.
The study looked into 36 criteria to measure the quality of services provided by local leaders.
The study looked into 36 criteria to measure the quality of services provided by local leaders.
It used the data to rank cities based on how well they manage their public funds.
The study placed San Francisco 148th out of the 150 cities in the country.
In contrast, Idaho’s Nampa was named as the best local governance hub.
The mayor’s office criticized the rankings, saying they are inaccurate and misleading.
They compare San Francisco’s budget with that of other cities.
In her State of the City speech earlier this year, Breed highlighted the various achievements of San Francisco.
She noted that the city’s low crime rate and the establishment of affordable housing are some of the factors that have contributed to its success.
I’m tired of people talking about San Francisco as if its problems are inevitable and its successes are a fluke.
During her speech, the mayor noted that San Francisco’s achievements are not a fluke.
They’re the result of years of hard work and collaboration.
Despite being ranked poorly, a study by WalletHub praised Fremont for having the lowest poverty rate in the country.
San Francisco’s achievement is the result of the hard work and collaboration of thousands of individuals.
The financial website WalletHub also named Fremont as the best place in the country to raise a family, based on various factors.
Other cities in the US that were featured in the list included Lexington-Fayette in Kentucky, Boise, Idaho, and Nashua, NH.
Wichita, Kansas, was ranked 10th in the country.
Other cities that were included in the list included Columbus, Georgia, and Raleigh, North Carolina.
